| ■No11287に返信(pipitさんの記事)
> 超越論的な原理論は、超越論的な感性論と超越論的な論理学に分別される。
>
> 超越論的な論理学は、分析論と弁証論に分別される。
>
> 分析論は、概念の分析論と、原則の分析論に分別される。<
んーなるほど。
カントにとっては、一般論理学を
>General logic, then, resolves the whole formal business of understanding and reason into its elements, and exhibits them as principles of all logical judging of our cognitions. <
知性の動き方の形式を各要素に分解分析した学ととらえたように、
対象に人間がアプリオリに関わる領域での、内容を切り捨てない、知性の機能の形式の分解分析が、超越論的論理学の中の『分析論』で、その中でのカテゴリー（純粋悟性概念）の〈発見〉とその提示が、『概念の分析論』ということかなと思いました。
『概念の分析論』と名付けてるけど、何かの概念を分析するということではなく、知性という能力そのものを分析することを目指す、とありますね。
B91あたり。
By the term Analytic of Conceptions, （略）I mean （略）dissection of the faculty of understanding itself, （略）We shall therefore follow up the pure conceptions even to their germs and beginnings in the human understanding, in which they lie, until they are developed on occasions presented by experience, （略）
知性の機能に内蔵されている？概念たちを分別してみるんだね。
変な略し方してるかもなので、略なしバージョンもコピペします。
B91あたり？
By the term Analytic of Conceptions, I do not understand the analysis of these, or the usual process in philosophical investigations of dissecting the conceptions which present themselves, according to their content, and so making them clear; but I mean the hitherto little attempted dissection of the faculty of understanding itself, in order to investigate the possibility of conceptions a priori, by looking for them in the understanding alone, as their birthplace, and analysing the pure use of this faculty. For this is the proper duty of a transcendental philosophy; what remains is the logical treatment of the conceptions in philosophy in general. We shall therefore follow up the pure conceptions even to their germs and beginnings in the human understanding, in which they lie, until they are developed on occasions presented by experience, and, freed by the same understanding from the empirical conditions attaching to them, are set forth in their unalloyed purity.
|
