| B87あたりの英訳です。
中山先生本では2巻のp37
『第四節 超越論的な論理学は超越論的な分析論と弁証論に区分される』の箇所です。
分析論（真理の論理学）に①、弁証論（仮象の論理学）に②の記号を挿入しておきます。
IV. Of the Division of Transcendental Logic into Transcendental Analytic and Dialectic.
（略）
①That part of transcendental logic, then, which treats of the elements of pure cognition of the understanding,
and of the principles without which no object at all can be thought,
is transcendental analytic, and at the same time a logic of truth.
（略）
①→②Now, as it ought properly to be only a canon for judging of the empirical use of the understanding,
this kind of logic is misused when we seek to employ it as an organon of the universal and unlimited exercise of the
tanding,
and attempt with the pure understanding alone to judge synthetically,
affirm, and determine respecting objects in general.
In this case the exercise of the pure understanding becomes dialectical.
②The second part of our transcendental logic must therefore be a critique of dialectical illusion,
and this critique we shall term transcendental dialectic（略） as a critique of understanding and reason in regard to their hyperphysical use.
This critique will expose the groundless nature of the pretensions of these two faculties,
and invalidate their claims to the discovery and enlargement of our cognitions merely by means of transcendental principles,
and show that the proper employment of these faculties is to test the judgements made by the pure understanding,
and to guard it from sophistical delusion.
最後らへんの、two faculties は、悟性（知性）と理性のことを指してると思っています。
中山先生は、『知性と理性』と訳されています。
|
