□投稿者/ pipit -(2021/04/21(Wed) 23:37:57)
| 2021/04/21(Wed) 23:47:13 編集(投稿者)
形而上学的演繹と超越論的演繹の箇所の記述構造が理解できなくて、
カントの思考回路が？？？とわからなくて、
はじめに戻って、序文に目を通してるのですが、
興味深く思う記述がありました。
Now these sciences, if they can be termed rational at all, must contain elements of a priori cognition, and this cognition may stand in a twofold relation to its object. Either it may have to determine the conception of the object―which must be supplied extraneously, or it may have to establish its reality. The former is theoretical, the latter practical, rational cognition.
|
|
